Transformers

Film Title: Transformers
Year: 2007
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Length: 144 minutes
Film Genre: Action / Adenture / Sci-Fi / 2007
Director: Michael Bay
Producer: Steven Spielberg, Michael Bay, et. al.
Writers: John Rogers (story), Robert Orci and Alex Kurtzman (story and screenplay)
Players:
Shia LaBeouf as Sam Witwicki
Megan Fox as Mikaela Banes
John Voight as Defense Secretary John Keller
John Torturro as Agent Simmons
Plot: Alien robots have come to earth to find the power of the lost All Spark and have no problem leaving destruction and death in their wake. A band of heroes has also come to save the people of earth.
Acting: The thespian efforts in the film could certainly be better, but story, action and effects make up where acting is lacking. Not one of Torturro's best.
Cinematography: Good. The first time the audience sees Optimus Prime transform, one might hear a cheer from some (coming from a fan of the original show).
Visual: Incredible visual effects throughout, if maybe too much.
Audio: Very good
When I watched it last: A few weeks prior to review
What to watch for: Awesome special effects, Optimus Prime, 2008 Mustang GT and 2009 Camaro.
What to watch out for: Some language
IMDB Rating: 7.7 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: 3 out of 4 stars; "It's goofy fun with a lot of stuff that blows up real good, and it has the grace not only to realize how preposterous it is, but to make that into an asset."
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.2 out of 10; Transformers is a fun, action-packed adventure to save the world. Don't miss one of 2007's best.
--Reviewed by Brady

Deja Vu

Film Title: Deja Vu
Year: 2006
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Length: 128 minutes
Film Genre: Action / Drama / Sci-Fi / Thriller
Director: Tony Scott
Producer: Jerry Bruckheimer, et. al.
Writers: Bill Marsilii and Terry Rossio
Players:
Denzel Washington as Doug Carlin
Paula Patton as Claire Kuchever
Val Kilmer as Agent Pryzwarra
Jim Caviezel as Carroll Oerstadt
Plot: ATF agent Doug Carlin (Washington) investigates a ferry explosion and finds a secret government experiment that allows investigators to see the past. An obsession with one victim propels Carlin to attempt to change it.
Acting: Denzel strikes again as an enforcer of the law. One would think that he had oversaturated the genre (Out of Time, Training Day, Inside Man, etc...), but once again he impresses with his characterization. None of the other actors are particularly outstanding in Deja Vu, but the sum total of acting is superb.
Cinematography: Good.
Visual: One of the movies strong points. The Special FX in Deja Vu are phenomenal. The explosion of the ferry in the beginning is one of the best ever seen in a film. The digital aspects of the movie are mesmerizing at times. In order to not spoil the film, it will be left at that.
Audio: Good.
When I watched it last: One day prior to review.
What to watch for: Denzel, an awesome plotline, edge of your seat action and suspense, the discussion that will inevitably occur after the movie.
What to watch out for: Language, intense drama, very brief nudity, some violence.
IMDB Rating: 6.9 out of 10
Chicago Tribune Rating: 3 out of 4 stars; "It's an almost overwhelmingly professional picture, murderously fast, slick and full of outlandish notions, painstakingly realized...surprisingly satisfying -- thanks to Washington, a good cast, Tony Scott's swift direction and that unyielding professionalism" (Michael Wilmington).
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.7 out of 10; A thrilling ride like you've never seen before...or have you?!
--Reviewed by Brady

Batoru rowaiaru (Battle Royale)

Film Title: Battle Royale
Year: 2000
MPAA Rating: N/A
Length: 114 min / Japan:122 min (director's cut)
Film Genre: Action / Drama / Thriller
Director: Kinji Fukasaku
Producer: Kenta Fukasaku
Writers:
Koushun Takami (novel)
Kenta Fukasaku (screenplay)
Players:
Tatsuya Fujiwara as Shuya Nanahara - Boy #15
Aki Maeda as Noriko Nakagawa - Girl #15
Taro Yamamoto as Shougo Kawada - Boy #5
Chiaki Kuriyama as Takako Chigusa - Girl #13
Sousuke Takaoka as Hiroki Sugimura - Boy #11
Plot: At the dawn of the new millennium the Japanese government is near collapse. Unemployment is at an all time high and the violence amongst the nations youth is running rampant. In an effort to combat this problem the government introduces the Battle Royale Act. Each year a class of high school students are selected at random for a "field trip". They are kidnapped and taken to a deserted island where they are forced to participate in a fight to the death, the last one left alive is allowed to return home. The "game" is used as the ultimate sign of what the government will do to punish disobedient youth.
Acting: A bunch of teenage kids. Nothing really top notch. One thing is worth mentioning Chiaki Kuriyama plays Go-Go Yubari in Kill Bill Vol. 1
Cinematography Great overhead shots and great close-ups
Visual: The island is gorgeous with very elaborate sets pieces.
Audio: Standard. Nothing spectacular
When I watched it last: An hour ago
What to watch for: Crazy Story, Social Commentary
What to watch out for: Subtitles, Language, Gory Violence (At times), Sexual overtones
IMDB Rating: 8.0 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: N/A
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.4 out of 10. I have wanted to see this film for a long time, it is interesting to say the very least. Japanese films tend to be over the top when it comes to violence and this one is no exception. This story accurately depicts the reality of sin and the violent nature of man. Kill or be killed is the law and friend quickly becomes foe in the world of the Battle Royale.
--Reviewed by Jason

Frank Miller's 300

Film Title: 300
Year: 2007
MPAA Rating: R
Length: 117
Film Genre: Action / Art / Drama / History / War
Director: Zack Snyder
Producer(s): Frank Miller, et. al.
Writers(s): Zack Snyder, Kurt Johnstad and Michael Gordon (screenplay); Frank Miller and Lynn Varley (graphic novel)
Players:
Gerard Butler as King Leonidas
Lena Headey as Queen Gorgo
David Wenham as Dilios
Dominic West as Theron
Vincent Regan as Captain
Rodrigo Santoro as Xerxes
Plot: The mighty Persian Empire demands defiant Sparta's allegiance, but King Leonidas will not bow to King Xerxes rule. The million man Persian Army marches against tiny Sparta and King Leonidas takes 300 of his bravest men to challenge them. Loosely based on the true story of the Battle of Thermopylae which took place in 480 BC.
Acting: The acting is certainly over-dramatised in 300, but that is expected (if not necessary) in the portrayal of a graphic novel. Butler, Regan and Wenham stand tall above the rest of the cast as the three main Spartan warriors.
Cinematography: Amazing! See Visual.
Visual: One of the grand visual spectacles of cinematic history! Blood looks like paint on a canvas, helping to drop the uber-violent content. The use of slow-motion and high-contrast desaturation make this movie a heart-pounding thriller and a stunning visual masterpiece. Costume was - for the most part - incredible, especially the many cultures represented in the diverse Persian Army (Chinese, Arab, African and European warriors were all represented). Surreal backgrounds and sets help maintain the feel of a graphic novel. A grainy film technique finishes off the visuals, solidifying 300 as the new benchmark for FX techniques.
Audio: Very good.
When I watched it last: One night prior to review.
What to watch for: Jaw-dropping visual effects; a great story told in the most incredible, sensory-numbing fashion.
What to watch out for: Nudity; Sexual Content including one sex scene and an implied orgy; Surprisingly goes without cursing; Blood and Gore with several decapitated bodies and severed limbs.
IMDB Rating: 8.4 out of 10
Roger Ebert (Chicago Sun-Times) Rating: 4 out of 4 stars (Richard Roeper); "This is a film that never, not for one second, considers taking its foot off the accelerator."
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.5 out of 10; Without the nudity and sexuality, I would consider this one of the best films I've ever seen. If blood and sex bother you, don't watch this one. If you love graphic novels and can handle the rough nature of the film, this is the movie for you.
--Reviewed by Brady

Movie in a Minute: Rocky Balboa

Another Rocky movie? Are you serious?! YES, I am! Thank you Sylvester Stallone for not leaving it at Rocky V, one of the biggest disappointments in all of filmdom. Written, directed, produced and starring John Rambo, Judge Dredd or whatever stereotypical Stallone action hero you choose. As is very evident in the film, Stallone has aged quite a bit, but still holds his own. Nearly everything about this movie was good. Nearly everything. There were the now cliche lines one would hear from Balboa, but you almost come to expect them. The acting in the film was as good or better than most of the other films (excluding possibly the original). The cinematography made this movie, along with the seemless interspersion of flashbacks from the previous movies. This movie has heart - and a lot of it - which is tough to come by in a film these days. Two things I must mention: 1) The use of black and white with color accents is great and 2) the fight is filmed as if it were a PPV fight (with the exception of the final round, of course) with info boxes and commentary. Awesome job, Sylvester Stallone...just don't make anymore please. Don't judge this movie until you've seen it!
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.3 out of 10
--Reviewed by Brady

Children of Men

Film Title: Children of Men
Year: 2006
MPAA Rating: R
Length: 109 minutes
Film Genre: Action / Drama / Sci-Fi / Thriller
Director: Alfonso Cuaron
Producer(s): Armyan Bernstein, Thomas A. Bliss
Writers(s): Alfonso Cuaron, et. al.
Players:
Clive Owen as Theodore Faron
Claire-Hope Ashitey as Kee
Julianne Moore as Julian Taylor
and Michael Caine as Jasper Palmer
Plot: For reasons unknown, humans have become sterile and to make things worse the youngest person in the world - an eighteen year old - has just died. In the chaotic world of not-too-distant-future England, a refugee girl has turned up pregnant and a few brave people must attempt to get her to scientists who can figure out the "cure" to infertility.
Acting: Children of Men is a good movie and better thespian efforts (along with some plot adjustments) could have made this a great movie. Clive Owen is a great actor, but he cannot hold this one up on his own. Julianne Moore proves, yet again, why she should not be allowed to have any serious roles: uninspired and unconvincing come to mind.
Cinematography: Some blurry camera work makes for headaches, almost literally at points, escpecially during close-ups and zooming shots. Otherwise, the cinematography is good. Minus a few easliy recognisable set-up shots, the filming draws you into the story in a very "real" way.
Visual: Settings were often reminiscent of Orwell's descriptions in 1984 and Equilibrium's Libria: the wealthy in their beautiful Greek and Roman inspired neo-cathedrals and the poor or middle class, as it were, in chaotic slums. Scenes of confrontation with police and government authorities are brutal and graphic, many victims with missing limbs and bloody wounds.
Audio: Sometimes the sound seems to come from places it should not, like in a conversation including several persons. The voices come from every direction, but often from the wrong side. A tad bit confusing (and frustrating) for audiophiles, like the author of this article.
When I watched it last: A few hours ago
What to watch for: A good story (maybe poorly executed at times, but still a very good story), a sometimes-exciting thriller
What to watch out for: Language, Strong Violence, Momentary Nudity, Some Drug Use, Julianne Moore
IMDB Rating: 8.0 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: NA
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 7.1 out of 10; Some may find it entertaining, but not a great movie by most any means, but a decent film nonetheless.
--Reviewed by Brady

Munich

Film Title: Munich
Year: 2005
MPAA Rating: R
Length: 164 minutes
Film Genre: Action / Drama / History
Director: Steven Spielberg
Producer: Kathleen Kennedy, Barry Mendel, Steven Spielberg, Colin Wilson
Writers: Tony Kushner and Eric Roth (screenplay) / George Jonas (book)
Players:
Eric Bana as Avner
Daniel Craig as Steve
Ciaran Hinds as Carl
Plot: 11 Israeli Olympians died in a hostage crisis at the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich. A team of mercenaries was assembled by the Israeli government to "take care" of those responsible. Flashbacks of the hostage situation are interspersed with the assasinations of the Palestinian conspirators.
Acting: Munich stars several up and coming actors plus a few seasoned veterans. The great character alchemist Spielberg creates another incredible ensemble. Bana is a great lead man - belonging with the likes of the also young Christian Bale (Equilibrium, American Psycho, Batman Begins). Daniel Craig, the new and improved 007 (Casino Royale), shows his blooming potential in his protrayal of the ever-abrasive and sometimes comedic David. Hinds' Carl reminds one of a past nearly forgotten in his classic style and demeanor.
Cinematography: You average Spielberg shots - some of the best. A vintage feel with its slightly desaturated color palette.
Visual: Some disturbing usage of explosives (a charge planted in a man's bed, for example), but some of the best witnessed in a film. They are believable and powerful at the same time - a feat hard to come by in a movie.
Audio: Great! Great! Great!
When I watched it last: An hour ago
What to watch for: Performance by Bana, the oh-so-real feel of the film (due in part to clips from actual 1972 news programs and spot-on creations of other broadcasts), a story of Avner's family so many miles away in Brooklyn and finally the madness of a man driven to guilt and paranoia.
What to watch out for: Language, Violence, Mild Sexual Content, Nudity (a woman is shot and left naked)
IMDB Rating: 7.9 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: 4 out of 4 stars; "Munich is an act of courage and conscience...As a thriller, Munich is efficient, absorbing, effective. As an ethical argument, it is haunting."
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.2 out of 10; The content of the movie may split some opinions of the movie, but it is a striking success of a film. Watch this one.
--Reviewed by Brady

Eragon

Film Title: Eragon
Year: 2006
MPAA Rating: PG
Length: 104 minutes
Film Genre: Action / Adventure / Fantasy
Director: Stefen Fangmeier
Producer: John Davis, Wyck Godfrey, Adam Goodman
Writer: Christopther Paolini (novel), Peter Buchman (screenplay)
Players:
Edward Speleers as Eragon
Jeremy Irons as Brom
Sienna Guillory as Arya
Robert Carlyle as Durza
Garrett Hedlund as Murtagh
John Malkovich as King Galbotorix
Plot: King Galbatorix has reigned as tyrant over Alegaesia for many years, ridding the land of the famed Dragon Riders. A young boy named Eragon steps forward to take hold of his destiny as the next - and possible last hope - of the riders.
Acting: A poor rating is probably giving too much credit to most of the actors in this film.
Cinematography: There are few scenes which show any real cinematographic merit. A few of the wide landscape sweeps are nice, but overall it is an average action adventure film.
Visual: Some of the flight scenes are good. Galbatorix's castle/hall/room/whatever you would call it is a poor job of design. It's just sad. I don't think there were actually any walls, it must have been an open set with a cloth map on one side and a big throne on the other.
Audio: A decent soundtrack.
When I watched it last: Two nights ago
What to watch for: Saphira and the incredibly beautiful Guillory as Arya.
What to watch out for: Dark magic, not much else. The acting and screenplay is bad enough. Thanks for ruining an incredible story!
IMDB Rating: 5.0 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: 2 out of 4 stars; "Tales of flying dragons and sword-wielding heroes are grand indeed, especially when the child in each of us can find a world of enchantment therein. Eragon could have, and should have been such a tale." (Miriam di Nunzio)
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 5.6 out of 10. As Durza, the Shade, relates Eragon, "I expected you to be...well...more." I couldn't have said it better myself.
--Reviewed by Brady

Casino Royale (2006)

Film Title: Casino Royale
Year: 2006
MPAA Rating: P-13
Length: 144 minutes
Film Genre: Action / Adventure / Thriller
Director: Martin Campbell
Producer: Barbara Brocolli
Writers: Neil Purvis, Robert Wade and Ian Flemming
Players:
Daniel Craig as James Bond/007
Ava Green as Vesper Lynn
Mads Mikkelson as Le Chiffre
Judi Dench as M
Jeffrey Wright as Felix Leiter
Plot: The very first assignment for MI6 agent James Bond. Bond's mission: To stop international banker/terrorist Le Chiffre from winning a high stakes poker tournament at the Casino Royale.
Acting: In my humble opinion Daniel Craig is the best Bond since Connery. I stated many months ago that this Bond movie was not going to be anything like the others, and that much like Batman Begins, was going to revitalize the dying Bond movie franchise, I was definately right (I love it when I'm right).
Cinematography This is Campbell's second Bond film (directed Goldeneye) and he does a fantastic job directing this one. This movie is not like Goldeneye or really any other Bond film for that matter. The first 10 minutes of the film are black and white, it really added to the feel that this movie was going to be dark. The movie is definately darker than any of the other movies (which is what I predicted), it has some of the comedic elements of the others films and carries the classic Bond elements but takes it up a notch. The darker feel in my opinion is the way it should be. Bond: "So you're telling me you want me to be half monk, half hitman". James Bond is a series about a spy with a license to kill, this movie is the first time you really see this played out to the extreme and it is awesome.
Visual: Awesome action, camera work is great, gritty, the black and white beginning is awesome.
Audio: Chris Cornell (Audioslave/Soundgarden) does the opening song.
When I watched it last: Last Night
What to watch for: If you like James Bond movies then this one is for you. It is not all gadgets and guns, there is a good deal of hand to hand combat. Watch for the random moments of classic Bond comedy.
What to watch out for: Hmm....torture scene...just wait for it...you'll understand. Pacing is slow at times and it is a little long.
IMDB Rating: 8.1 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: 3 out of 4 stars
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.7 out of 10. This movie is just plain great. In high school I was a huge Bond fan, especially of the Connery and Moore ones. Goldeneye was alright, but after that the Bond franchise tanked. This movie is the re-invention of a cinematic icon, kinda cool they are starting at the characters beginning.
--Reviewed by Jason

Nochnoy Dozer / Night Watch

Film Title: Nochnoy Dozer (Russian)/ Night Watch (English)
Year: 2004 (Russia) 2006 (America)
MPAA Rating: R
Length: 114 minutes
Film Genre: Action / Fantasy / Horror / Fiction / Foreign
Director: Timur Bekmambetov
Producer: Varvara Avdyushko
Writers: Timur Bekmambetov
Players:
Anton Gorodetsky: Konstantin Khabensky
Boris Gesser: Vladimir Menshov
Zavulon: Viktor Verzhbitsky
Svetlana: Mariya Poroshina
Olga, sorceress (owl): Galina Tyunina
Ignat: Gosha Kytsenko
Yegor: Dima Martynov
Larisa: Anna Dubrovskaya
Kostya: Aleksei Chadov
Bear: Aleksander Samojlenko
Plot: The forces of Light and Dark have been waging an eternal war. Known as the Others these two factions create a truce and as part of this truce create policing units called Night watch and Day Watch. The Night Watch is the police unit of the Light and enforce the rules of the truce and make sure that the Balance is held.
Acting:
The acting in this movie is good, nothing spectacular
Cinematography The cinematography is pretty standard nothing too fancy. However, the interlacing of the subtitles into the movie itself is shear brilliance.
Visual: Amazing special effects (over 400 in the movie).
Audio: The audio is about as good as the special effects, it really helps to emerse you in the film.
When I watched it last: Last night
What to watch for: Amazing and unique special effects. Interesting twist on an age old story. Awesome subtitles (you just have to see it for yourself)
What to watch out for: Language. Lots of blood. Slow at times
IMDB Rating: 6.4 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: 2 stars
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.0 out of 10. An interesting concept. Special effects are amazing. Subtitle animation is unique. This movie is the 1st in a trilogy, and a good builder movie. Worth buying if you like these sort of movies.
--Reviewed by Jason

Shichinin no Samurai / Seven Samurai

Film Title: Shichinin no Samurai / Seven Samurai
Year: 1954
MPAA Rating: None
Length: 3 hours and 27 minutes
Film Genre: Action / Drama
Director: Akira Kurosawa
Producer: Sojiro Motoki
Writers: Akira Kurosawa
Players:
Takashi Shimura as Kambei Shimada
Toshiro Mifune as Kikuchiyo
Yoshio Inaba as Gorobei Katayama
Seiji Miyaguchi as Kyuzo
Minoru Chiaki as Heihachi Hayshida
Daisuke Kato as Shichiroji
Isao KImura as Katsushiro Okamoto
Plot: A village of poor farmers is attacked and plundered each year by bandits. Fed up and scared the villagers recruit seven samurai to defend them.
Acting: The acting is very interesting. As you watch this film you being to love each and everyone of the samurai, the movie is long and allows for the characters to really develop. You also develop a severe dislike for the gutless farmers and their fears. This is the second film that Shimura and Mifune work with Kurosawa, their first being Rashomon.
Cinematography: This is the beginnings of action film making and it really is amazing to look at this film and see how far we have come. The camera work is really cool and Kurosawa uses some techniques that become staples in many modern movies.
Visual: This is a black and white film yet at the same time it does not detract from the movie.
Audio: Good audio nothing special but also remember it was made in 1954
When I watched it last: 3 days ago
What to watch for: Everything, it is a great film any cinema lover should see. Acting is great, story is great, and the humor is hillarious. Watch out for a random farmer who gets smashed when a bandits horse comes riding in....it can't be scripted cause he gets nailed!
What to watch out for: 3 hours long. Slow to build up to the finale. Black and White. Japanese subtitled
IMDB Rating: 8.8 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: Great Film (4 stars)
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.8 out of 10. A true classic, this film should be watched at least once by any film enthusist. This movie has inspired countless adaptations and spin offs including the western the Magnificent Seven. Akira Kurosawa is one of the most masterful story creaters and tellers in all of cinema history.
--Reviewed by Jason
Brady's Review of Seven Samurai

Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby

Film Title: Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby
Year: 2006
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Length: 105 minutes
Film Genre(s): Comedy, Action
Director(s): Adam McKay
Producer(s): Adam McKay, Will Ferrell, Ryan Kavanaugh, et. al.
Writer(s): Will Ferrell, Adam McKay
Players:
Will Ferrell as Ricky Bobby
John C. Reilly as Cal Naughton, Jr.
Gary Cole as Reese Bobby
Jane Lynch as Lucy Bobby
Michael Clarke Duncan as Lucius Washington
Leslie Bibb as Carly Bobby
Amy Adams as Susan
Houton Tumlin as Walker
Grayson Russell as Texas Ranger
Sacha Baron Cohen as Jean Girard
and cameos by various NASCAR stars, Elvis Costello and Mos Def
Plot: The famous stock car driver Ricky Bobby is challenged by a Frenchman from "Formula Un", but his determination is crushed after a horrible accident. Laughs around every turn.
Acting: Ferrell is funny and that's all you need to know. Even if you've had a disposition toward him in past movies, you should see this one.
Cinematography: Who cares.
Visual: See "Cinematography".
Audio: See "Visual".
What to watch for: Outrageous hilarity. Grayson Russell's performance near the end will have you peeing-your-pants, doubling-over-on-the-floor, snorting-milk-from-your-nose laughing...and he's under 10 years old.
What to watch out for: Crude humor and some language.
When I watched it last: A few nights prior to review.
IMDB User Rating: 6.8 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: 3.5 out of 4 stars;
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 7.9 out of 10 stars; Funny and entertaining! A must see, especially if you're a NASCAR fan.
- - Reveiwed by JB

Heat

Film Title: Heat
Year: 1995
MPAA Rating: R
Length: 171/188 (edited and unedited)
Film Genre: Action/Crime/Drama/Thriller
Director: Michael Mann
Producer: Pieter Jan Brugge
Writers: Michael Mann
Players:
Al Pacino as Lt. Vincent Hanna
Robert De Niro as Neil McCauley
Val Kilmer as Chris Shiherlis
Jon Voight as Nate
Tom Sizemore as Michael Cheritto
Amy Brenneman as Eady
Ashley Judd as Charlene Shiherlis
Natalie Portman as Lauren Gustafson
Dennis Haysbert as Donald Breedan
Plot: Neil McCauley heads a gang of heavily armed and highly determined theives/bank robbers who square off against Lt. Hanna in a deadly game of cat and mouse.
Acting: The acting in this film was top self. Pacino and De Niro give some mind numbing performances, makes you wonder why this is their only film together. Kilmer and Sizemore give amazing support to De Niro as members of his gang. Something to note, most of the support characters in this movie have gone on to big name success themselves (Judd, Portman, Brenneman and Haysbert.)
Cinematography Dante Spinotti does an amazing job as Cinematographer (Director of Photography), no wonder Mann has used him on three of his films (The Insider, Heat and Last of the Mohicans). Mann is an amazing director and you can truly see his unique style in this movie.
Visual: Mann shoots scenes a certain way. If you have seen the trailer for Miami Vice and his movies Collateral and Heat you will note his style. He loves night scenes intertwined with landscape shots, He loves night driving scenes with city lights reflecting on windshields and rear window, running scenes are close up and tight on the characters and a trade mark, he puts you right in the middle of the action. He puts you in the faces of the actors or over their shoulders, this adds so much to the intensity of the action. The movie is a visual masterpiece.
Audio: The sound for the movie is good for an action movie. Subtle volume changes between scenes of action and dialogue. The gun battles are amazing, a must for surround sound owners
When I watched it last: 1 hour ago
What to watch for: Amazing Performances by Pacino and De Niro as well as the supporting cast. Classic diner table scene as Cop and Criminal share a cup of coffee. Classic Michael Mann directing (vehicle tracking shots and down in the action gun battles)
What to watch out for: Excessive Language and Violence. 3 Hours Long!
IMDB Rating: 8.0 out of 10
Roger Ebert Rating: 3 1/2 out of 4 stars
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 9.0 out of 10. Beautiful movie, Amazing Cast, Incredible directing and Gripping story. This movie is the top of what the crime/action/drama genre should be, a must own.
--Reviewed by Jason

Glory

Film Title: Glory
Year: 1989
MPAA Rating: R
Length: 122 min
Film Genre(s): Action / Drama / History / War
Director(s): Edward Zwick
Producer(s): Pieter Jan Brugge
Writer(s): Robert Gould Shaw (letters). Lincoln Kirstein (book)
Players:
Matthew Broderick as Col. Robert Gould Shaw
Denzel Washington as Pvt. Trip
Cary Elwes as Maj. Cobot Forbes
Morgan Freeman as Sgt. Maj. John Rawlins
Plot: Col. Robert Shaw leads the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer infantry, a regiment of Black solders led by white officers. The film tells the story of the regiment and their role in the Civil War.
Acting: All four of the major players of this film give incredible performances. Matthew Broderick gives a stunning performance as Col. Shaw, a solder who reluctantly at times maintains his role as the regiments commanding officer but never wavers in his devotion to his men. Cary Elwes also gives a top notch performance as Maj. Forbes. Elwes plays well against Broderick's sense of duty and brings humanity and compassion to the leadership. Both men shine as the regiments commanding officers. Morgan Freeman and Denzel Washington give knock out performances. Freeman is amazing in his role as the Sgt. Maj. and Washington really brings some emotion and power to the film. (Washington received the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor for this film)
Cinematography: Cinematographer Freddie Francis won the Academy Award for his work on this film and rightly so. His presentation of the battle scenes are simple yet amazing. Francis uses a lot of close up shots on the title characters, this adds to their performances, he has the uncanny ablility to capture every ounce of their emotion.
Visual: The costumes and set pieces reflect the time period. The special effects and battle scenes are on par with other movies set in this time period.
Audio: This movie also won the Academy Award for Best Sound. The score and sound effects for this film are great.
When I watched it last. During the review
What to watch for: All four of the major characters deliver jaw dropping performances. The scene where Washington is disciplined for dessertion will stir your heart.
What to watch out for: Some of the battle violence is gruesome. Exploding heads are a little shocking. Some language.
IMDB User Rating: 8.1 out of 10.
Roger Ebert Rating: 3½ out of 4 stars
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.7 out of 10. An amazing war film with tons of heart. An incredibly moving film about hope, heriorism and history. If you haven't seen this movie before now punch yourself (Jason punches himself)
--Reviewed by Jason

Seven Samurai / Shichinin no Samurai

Film Title: Seven Samurai; Shichinin no Samurai
Year: 1954
MPAA Rating: unrated (Canada and UK: PG)
Length: 206 minutes
Film Genre(s): Action, Drama, Foreign, Martial Arts, elements of Comedy
Director(s): Akira Kurosawa
Producer(s): Sojiro Motoki
Writer(s): Akira Kurosawa, Shinobu Hashimoto, Hideo Oguni
Players:
Takashi Shimura as Kambei Shimada
Toshiro Mifune as Kikuchiyo
Yoshio Inaba as Gorobei Katayama
Seiji Miyaguchi as Kyuzo
Minoru Chiaki as Heihachi Hayshida
Diasuke Kato as Shichiroji
Isao Kimura as Katsushiro Okamoto
Keiko Tsushima as Shino
Kamatari Fujiwara as Manzo
Kokuten Kodo as Gisaku, "Grandad"
Plot: Each year, bandits attack a small village and pillage the farmers' crops and burn houses. The farmers decide to hire samurai to protect the village. Two worlds come together for a striking action drama for the ages.
Acting: Classic foreign films have always been hard to watch. Subtitles, poor dubbing and cultural differences have often ruined perfectly good classic foreign films (and even some newer foreign movies). This movie is a grand exception to that stereotype. With Shimura and Mifune - by now a seasoned duo - Seven Samurai is pure magic, not to mention the other five samurai who each bring another necessary role to the screen.
Cinematography: Kurosawa was a groundbreaking director as far as the camera is concerned. This was probably his most progressive area of direction. Seven Samurai is yet another example of his dramatic vision. The camera stays still when it should and moves at the perfect time. At times, the viewer feels as though he is watching a documentary of life in feudal Japan, experiencing the joys and trials, victories and defeats and the mudane and exciting lives of the people onscreen. You quickly become empathetic towards them, hurting and hoping with them.
Visual: So many times in Kurosawa films, the camera purposefully peers through set pieces and props. It gives you the feeling of being in the action, a bystander hiding in the background. Mifune's outrageous sword mirrors his confidence and contrasts his naivete.
Audio: The audio is often nothing more than dialogue, which is not strange for the time period. Sound effects were not used often. If you can get past this, you should enjoy the film.
What to watch for: Everything - incredible acting, unforgetable characters, a wonderful plot, perfectly placed humor, forbidden romance, great cinematography and the list goes on and on...
What to watch out for: Language (in subtitles, unless you can understand Japanese)
When I watched it last: One night prior to review
IMDB User Rating: 8.8 out of 10; #7 of the top 250 movies of all time as rated by users.
Roger Ebert Rating: Included in his list of "Great Movies" (his highest honor). "[N]ot only a great film in its own right, but the source of a genre that would flow through the rest of the century. The critic Michael Jeck suggests that this was the first film in which a team is assembled to carry out a mission..."
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.9 out of 10; One of the best...ever. Quit your job and buy this movie.
- - Reveiwed by JB
Jason's Review of Seven Samurai

Hero; Ying Xiong

Film Title: Hero; Ying Xiong
Year: 2004 (USA release)
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Length: 99 minutes
Film Genre(s): Foreign, Martial Arts, Action, Drama, Adventure, Fantasy, History, Art
Director(s): Yimou Zhang
Producer(s): Yimou Zhang, Weiping Zhang, Shoufang Dou
Writer(s): Feng Li, Bin Wang, Yimou Zhang
Players:
Jet Li as Nameless
Tony Leung Chiu Wai as Broken Sword
Maggie Cheung as Flying Snow
Ziyi Zhang as Moon
Daoming Chen as King of Qin
Donnie Yen as Sky
Plot: A town prefect claims to have killed the three most dangerous assassins in the land of Qin. As a reward for his courage and bravery, the king of Qin allows the man to come close to the throne and drink with the king to tell the stories, but the king suspects that the prefect is a liar. It’s the tale of an unsung warrior becoming a national hero…in true Chinese mythical style.
Acting: The cast of this film is a veritable walk of fame as far - as Chinese actors are concerned. One could not ask for better performances of the players. Even if the story does not suit a person’s taste, the cast deserves lauds. Emotive and stirring performances pull one right into the action.
Cinematography: One would be hard-pressed to find a more awe-inspiring vision of China, or any part of the world for that matter. Rivaling New Zealand in The Lord of the Rings, the landscapes of the film are incredibly beautiful.
Visual: A-ma-zing! Few films can compare chromatically to the oversaturated palette of this movie. Color permeates the film making it seem surreal and dream-like, above and beyond reality, much like the choreography. “[T]he sets, costumes and special effects are of astonishing beauty” (rogerebert.suntimes.com). As with other Chinese fantasy-fables, physics is not even considered. Fight scenes make use of cables and digital effects. The characters whimsically float about, hang upside down and move with speed and fluidity that blurs time.
Audio: This movie is an audiophile’s dream. The music is wonderful. The best example of the film’s sound quality is in a fight scene between Nameless and Sky. Raindrops falling from eaves can be heard all around. The sounds of the fight envelope you in the action, making it seem as though you are right in the middle of the swordplay. An old man sits and plays a Guzheng (a popular, ancient Chinese, stringed musical instrument which is still played today). The music parodies the fight and at the climax of the scene the old man is playing so violently fast that he breaks all of the strings. That cacophony is the perfect peak point to the scene.
What to watch for: Jet Li’s best; Awesome choreography; Vivid color and imagery.
What to watch out for: A couple of places where the wire work was not fluid.
When I watched it last: One night prior to review
IMDB User Rating: 8.1 out of 10 stars; #153 on the top 250 movies of all time as voted by users.
Roger Ebert Rating: 3.5 out of 4 stars; "[B]eautiful and beguiling, a martial arts extravaganza..." "[A] visual poem of extraordinary beauty."
The Cinema Standard Overall Score: 8.2 out of 10; A must-see! One of the great Chinese martial arts movies.
- - Reveiwed by JB